Yes.
The smallest number divisible by 123456 is 123456 itself. Any number is divisible by itself, making it the smallest multiple of that number. Therefore, the answer is 123456.
None. Extremely simple proof: To be divisible by 5 the units digit must be 5. But then it would not be divisible by 2.
Since the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, the original number is also divisible by 3.Since the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, the original number is also divisible by 3.Since the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, the original number is also divisible by 3.Since the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, the original number is also divisible by 3.
If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3 ,then the number is divisible by 3.. is 36 is right
To determine if a number is divisible by 3, you can sum its digits and check if the result is divisible by 3. For example, for the number 123, you would add 1 + 2 + 3 to get 6, which is divisible by 3. If the sum is divisible by 3, then the original number is also divisible by 3.
The smallest number divisible by 123456 is 123456 itself. Any number is divisible by itself, making it the smallest multiple of that number. Therefore, the answer is 123456.
Yes - 123456/2 = 61728
No, 60 is.
It is a 'multiple' of 123,456. The number of multiples is infinite.
123456
Yes, the result is 20,576.
None. Extremely simple proof: To be divisible by 5 the units digit must be 5. But then it would not be divisible by 2.
Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.
35 is not divisible by 3.
If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3.
No, it is not divisible by 123456 nor by 10.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.