The question could ask for the perfect cube of 56, which equals 563 = 175616.
However, it can also mean to ask whether 56 can be a cube, which could be answered by 56(1/3), which cubed is 56. Since 56(1/3) is an irrational number, it is impossible to construct this perfectly, but one can make arbitrary precise approximations, close to 3.825862365...
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
56 2,2,2,7 perfect cubes=1,8
2744
For a number to be a perfect square and a perfect cube, it must be a perfect sixth power. Now 36 = 729 is too small and 56 = 15625 is too large, leaving 46 = 4096 as the answer.
The cube root of -56 = -3.825862
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.
There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.