Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Since you didn't include the statements in your question there is no way for us to know
True. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. In a disjunction, if either statement is true, the disjunction is true.
Yes. That is what theorems are for. Once proven, their results do not need to be justified again (except for exams).
most of the raw materials used in industries are agricultural raw materials......... the industries manufacture pesticides,fertilizers, etc which are used in agricultural activities
It isn't clear what you want to justify.
The statement was intended to justify a social welfare policy that aims to address income inequality and support those in need.
imperialism
Business communication is often termed as the lifeblood of business concern justify this statement with an example?
And what information do you have to justify the statement?
conclusion
"Accounting Equation is true under all circumstances." Justify this statement with the help of five illustrations.
"Accounting Equation is true under all circumstances." Justify this statement with the help of examples.
yes
The CPU is what "thinks" about everything.
yes i cant do it ;)
The concept of competitve advantage is as important for non- profit orgnizations as it is for profit orgnizatios Do you agree with this statement or not? Explain with examples to justify your answer.
This statement means that you need to justify the choice of your selection. For example, if you choose a specific type of variable i.e., nominal, interval, etc. You need to show proof as to how you can statistically justify why you choose this particular variable. How can you justify the outcome of this type of variable chosen.