Then divide the remainder again by the divisor until you get a remainder smaller than your divisor or an remainder equal to zero.
The remainder in a division question should never be larger than the "divisor", but the remainder often is larger than the "answer" (quotient). For example, if 435 is divided by 63, the quotient is 22 and the remainder is 57.
A remainder can be any non-negative number that is less than the divisor. If the remainder is bigger than the divisor, the divisor can go into it another one (or more) times until the remainder is brought into that range.
no
Since 160 is bigger than 35, it goes in 0 times, with a remainder of 35.
You do something called the amazing disco. First you divide the bigger number by the remainder, than multiply by 6 than you add 52 and there you got your answer! ( Just joking)
The remainder can be greater than the divisor when the dividend is significantly larger than the divisor. In division, the remainder is the amount that is left over after dividing the dividend by the divisor. If the dividend is much larger than the divisor, it is likely that the remainder will also be larger than the divisor.
Yes, certainly. A quotient is the result of division ( a divisor into a dividend). The remainder can be bigger than the quotient, but not bigger than the divisor. For example 130 divided by 20 =6 with remainder of 10. Here 6 is the quotient and remainder is 10, which is bigger than the quotient
Because if the remainder is bigger than the divisor, the quotient can be increased and that will reduce the remainder. You can keep doing as long as the remainder is larger than the divisor. You stop only when it becomes smaller.
"4" is less than "4 with a remainder".
If the remained was bigger than the divisor than the divisor could still be taken out of the remainder
A remainder can be any non-negative number that is less than the divisor. If the remainder is bigger than the divisor, the divisor can go into it another one (or more) times until the remainder is brought into that range.
Yes, because that is how remainder is defined. If the remainder was bigger, you would subtract one (or more) modular values until the remainder became smaller than the modulus.
No it shouldn't because the divisor should always be bigger.
no
Since 160 is bigger than 35, it goes in 0 times, with a remainder of 35.
No, cause the remainder might be bigger than divisor.
You do something called the amazing disco. First you divide the bigger number by the remainder, than multiply by 6 than you add 52 and there you got your answer! ( Just joking)
A factor of 75 that is bigger than 20 but smaller than 30 is 25. A factor is a number that divides another number without leaving a remainder. In this case, 25 is a factor of 75 because 75 divided by 25 equals 3.