yes it can because when it is flat there is no slope at all
The slope of a vertical line is not defined.
Because of undefined slope, because undefined slope does not have a slope it doesn't have anything to substitute for m in the point slope equation.
All parallel lines have a zero slope.
A single point cannot determine the slope of a straight line. It can, therefore, have any slope at all.
yes it can because when it is flat there is no slope at all
Alaska's Regions:South Central PanhandleInteriorSouthwestNorth Slope.
The slope is any real number.
The slope of a vertical line is not defined.
Slopes can go all different ways. It all depends on the size of the slope.
Because of undefined slope, because undefined slope does not have a slope it doesn't have anything to substitute for m in the point slope equation.
All parallel lines have a zero slope.
For example, if the slope at a certain point is 1.5, you can draw a line that goes through the specified point, with that slope. The line would represent the slope at that point. If you want to graph the slope at ALL POINTS, take the derivative of the function, and graph the derivative. The derivative shows the slope of a function at all points.
The slope of a horizontal line is zero. That's because the slope measures how steep the line is, and a flat line is not steep at all and therefore has no slope.
A single point cannot determine the slope of a straight line. It can, therefore, have any slope at all.
the x-axis is the horizontal line which means the slope is 0. any line parallel also has a slope of zero
Although all lines have the relationship that defines slope, one can argue that not all lines do have one. The exception would be vertical lines. Slope is defined as the vertical rate of change divided by the horizontal rate of change. In the case of a vertical line, there is no horizontal rate of change, and calculating slope would cause division by zero. The closest you could come to expressing the slope of a vertical line would be ∞