No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.
1 is a factor of 4 that is not a multiple of 2.
No, 90 is a multiple of 2 and 5, but not 4.
No. 2 is a factor of 4. 4 is a multiple of 2.
LCM stands for lowest common multiple. So, it has to be the lowest integer multiple of both 2 and 4. So the LCM of 2 and 4 is 4 not 2.
Any multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2.
No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.
4 4 is the second multiple of 2 and the first multiple of itself, so it is the LCM of 2 and 4.
because... 4 does not go into 2 so it's not a multiple All multiples of 4 are multiples of 2.
it is 4,4 is a multiple of 4 by 1and4 is a multiple of 2 by 2
1 is a factor of 4 that is not a multiple of 2.
4 and any multiple of 4
4 is the lowest common multiple of 2 and 4. (2x2 and 4x1)
It's not. 4 is a multiple of 2. 2 is a factor of 4 because it can divide into 4 evenly with no remainder.
Any multiple of 4.
No, 90 is a multiple of 2 and 5, but not 4.
No. 2 is a factor of 4. 4 is a multiple of 2.