no. the definition of polygon is two dimentional and a prism is three dimentional
any shape with four sides.
A rectangular solid is a polygon, as it is a four-sided, six face object. In two dimensions, it will remain a polygon with intersecting lines at the interior, with no line exceeding the boudary of the edge of the object from any point of view.
add all the sides ???
Spliting up of vector into its rectangular components is called resolution of vector
no. the definition of polygon is two dimentional and a prism is three dimentional
any shape with four sides.
A rectangular solid is a polygon, as it is a four-sided, six face object. In two dimensions, it will remain a polygon with intersecting lines at the interior, with no line exceeding the boudary of the edge of the object from any point of view.
Depends on the cross-sectional polygon.
add all the sides ???
Spliting up of vector into its rectangular components is called resolution of vector
square method , rectangular method tae mo
Depends on the cross-sectional polygon.
A regular polygon with an exterior angle of40O is a nonagon, and has 9 sides.
No such thing . . . A rectangle is a four sided polygon and a hexagon is a six sided polygon. How they could mix, I have no clue.
One of the main advantages of using the polygon method is speed. The main disadvantage to this method is the fact that it cannot adequately represent curved items.
A prism.