No. If it cuts a graph it is not an asymptote.
It has no asymptote. 3x is a straight line and therefore is a tangent to itself.
It will have the same asymptote. One can derive a vertical asymptote from the denominator of a function. There is an asymptote at a value of x where the denominator equals 0. Therefore the 3 would go in the numerator when distributed and would have no effect as to where the vertical asymptote lies. So that would be true.
I don't know, what?
2
There is nothing in the definition of "asymptote" that forbids a graph to cross its asymptote. The only requirement for a line to be an asymptote is that if one of the coordinates gets larger and larger, the graph gets closer and closer to the asymptote. The "closer and closer" part is defined via limits.
A circle does not have an asymptote.
Asymptote Architecture was created in 1989.
No. If it cuts a graph it is not an asymptote.
No if the denominators cancel each other out there is no asymptote
An asymptote is a line or curve that approaches a given curve arbitrarily closely.
It has no asymptote. 3x is a straight line and therefore is a tangent to itself.
It will have the same asymptote. One can derive a vertical asymptote from the denominator of a function. There is an asymptote at a value of x where the denominator equals 0. Therefore the 3 would go in the numerator when distributed and would have no effect as to where the vertical asymptote lies. So that would be true.
Asymptote - vector graphics language - was created in 2004.
I don't know, what?
2
Yes, the asymptote is x = 0. In order for logarithmic equation to have an asymptote, the value inside log must be 0. Then, 5x = 0 → x = 0.