The terms are: 4, 8 and 16
Yes, that's what a geometric sequence is about.
yes
1 to 4
un = u0*rn for n = 1,2,3, ... where r is the constant multiple.
No. Although the ratios of the terms in the Fibonacci sequence do approach a constant, phi, in order for the Fibonacci sequence to be a geometric sequence the ratio of ALL of the terms has to be a constant, not just approaching one. A simple counterexample to show that this is not true is to notice that 1/1 is not equal to 2/1, nor is 3/2, 5/3, 8/5...
A descending geometric sequence is a sequence in which the ratio between successive terms is a positive constant which is less than 1.
Ratio
The difference between succeeding terms in a sequence is called the common difference in an arithmetic sequence, and the common ratio in a geometric sequence.
Yes, that's what a geometric sequence is about.
The sequence 2, 3, 5, 8, 12 is neither arithmetic nor geometric. In an arithmetic sequence, the difference between consecutive terms is constant, while in a geometric sequence, the ratio between consecutive terms is constant. In this sequence, there is no constant difference or ratio between consecutive terms, so it does not fit the criteria for either type of sequence.
yes
1 to 4
A static sequence: for example a geometric sequence with common ratio = 1.
FALSE (Apex)
It is 4374
Well, well, well, look who's getting fancy with geometric sequences! When the ratio between consecutive terms is "r," each term is found by multiplying the previous term by "r." So, in simpler terms, if you have a sequence like 2, 4, 8, 16, the ratio between consecutive terms is 2. Math can be sassy too, honey!
un = u0*rn for n = 1,2,3, ... where r is the constant multiple.