The question is based on a total misunderstanding. For example, 5 is a non-perfect square but 5 is not irrational!
45 is not a perfect square number. the closest perfect squares are 49 and 36. But it is the square of the irrational number 6.708204... (an infinite, non-terminating, non-repeating decimal).
Because anything times itself equals a perfect square and is considered that taking the square root of a perfect square (non negative numbers) which end result does not involve fractions but whole numbers is a perfect square. 1 x 1 = 1 sq.root(1) = 1 2 x 2 = 4 (Perfect square) sq.root(4) = 2
200 is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer.
A perfect square is a square of an integer (a whole number).
no 17 is a non-perfect square
No. 2.25 = 1.5^2 is a non-perfect square but it is rational.
It can be. 7 is a non-perfect square and, being an integer, it is rational.
It is not a perfect square.
It is not a perfect square.
the perfect square is a number that can muliply by its self to equeal its self.
I have never before heard of a non-perfect square but I suppose it would be any non-zero number that is not the square of an integer. People sometimes say "perfect square" to mean an integer that is a square of an integer - I think the "perfect" is redundant but if you do not think "square" is clear by itself, say "integer square."
The question is based on a total misunderstanding. For example, 5 is a non-perfect square but 5 is not irrational!
No. 2.25 is not a perfect square but it is rational.
No.1/4 is not a perfect square but its square roots are +/- 1/2 which are rational.
It is not a perfect square. 5-square = 25 6-square = 36 So there cannot be a perfect square between 25 and 36.
45 is not a perfect square number. the closest perfect squares are 49 and 36. But it is the square of the irrational number 6.708204... (an infinite, non-terminating, non-repeating decimal).