no 17 is a non-perfect square
It can be. 7 is a non-perfect square and, being an integer, it is rational.
I have never before heard of a non-perfect square but I suppose it would be any non-zero number that is not the square of an integer. People sometimes say "perfect square" to mean an integer that is a square of an integer - I think the "perfect" is redundant but if you do not think "square" is clear by itself, say "integer square."
No.1/4 is not a perfect square but its square roots are +/- 1/2 which are rational.
It is not a perfect square. 5-square = 25 6-square = 36 So there cannot be a perfect square between 25 and 36.
no 17 is a non-perfect square
No. 2.25 = 1.5^2 is a non-perfect square but it is rational.
It can be. 7 is a non-perfect square and, being an integer, it is rational.
It is not a perfect square.
It is not a perfect square.
I have never before heard of a non-perfect square but I suppose it would be any non-zero number that is not the square of an integer. People sometimes say "perfect square" to mean an integer that is a square of an integer - I think the "perfect" is redundant but if you do not think "square" is clear by itself, say "integer square."
non perfect square is that it cannot be divided by any of the number . It is divided by only itself and one
The question is based on a total misunderstanding. For example, 5 is a non-perfect square but 5 is not irrational!
No. 2.25 is not a perfect square but it is rational.
No.1/4 is not a perfect square but its square roots are +/- 1/2 which are rational.
It is not a perfect square. 5-square = 25 6-square = 36 So there cannot be a perfect square between 25 and 36.
45 is not a perfect square number. the closest perfect squares are 49 and 36. But it is the square of the irrational number 6.708204... (an infinite, non-terminating, non-repeating decimal).