Chat with our AI personalities
NO! Lnx + Ln2= 2 + Lnx implies Ln2 = 2 which implies 2 = e2 which is simply not true.
ln(x4)?d/dx(ln(u))=1/u*d/dx(u)d/dx(ln(x4))=[1/x4]*d/dx(x4)-The derivative of x4 is:d/dx(x4)=4x4-1d/dx(x4)=4x3d/dx(ln(x4))=[1/x4]*(4x3)d/dx(ln(x4))=4x3/x4d/dx(ln(x4))=4/x(lnx)4?Chain rule: d/dx(ux)=x(u)x-1*d/dx(u)d/dx(lnx)4=4(lnx)4-1*d/dx(lnx)d/dx(lnx)4=4(lnx)3*d/dx(lnx)-The derivative of lnx is:d/dx(ln(u))=1/u*d/dx(u)d/dx(lnx)=1/x*d/dx(x)d/dx(lnx)=1/x*(1)d/dx(lnx)=1/xd/dx(lnx)4=4(lnx)3*(1/x)d/dx(lnx)4=4(lnx)3/x
lnx + lnx +3 = (ln55)/4 2lnx +3 =(ln55)/4 8lnx + 12=ln55 8lnx=-12+ln55 lnx=(-12+ln55)/8 x=e^[(-12+ln55)/8]
First one: f'(x) = 2x*lnx + x^2*(1/x) = 2x*lnx + x = x*(2*lnx + 1) Second derivate: f"(x) = D [x*(2*lnx + 1)] = 1*(2*lnx + 1) + x*(2/x) = 2*lnx+1+2 = 2*lnx + 3 So, there is a minimum in this graph on point (1/e^(1/2)), -1/(2e)) = MIN(x, y) Van Sanden David Belgium
There are 2 interpretations of your question: First: e^[lnx + lny] =e^[ln(xy)] =xy Second: lny + e^(lnx) =lny + x