No, both unfavorable and favorable variances should be investigated. While unfavorable variances indicate areas where performance is lacking and may require corrective action, favorable variances can highlight opportunities for efficiency and best practices that can be leveraged further. Analyzing both types of variances provides a comprehensive understanding of performance and can inform better decision-making.
total master-budget variances
A favorable budget variance occurs when actual financial performance exceeds budgeted expectations, typically leading to higher revenues or lower expenses than planned. Conversely, an unfavorable budget variance arises when actual performance falls short of budgeted projections, resulting in lower revenues or higher expenses. Both types of variances are important for financial analysis, as they help organizations assess their operational efficiency and make necessary adjustments for future budgeting. Understanding these variances aids in strategic decision-making and resource allocation.
Yes, a positive variance is generally considered favorable in financial and performance analysis. It indicates that actual results are better than expected, such as higher revenues or lower costs than budgeted. This can lead to increased profitability and improved overall performance for an organization. However, context matters, as not all positive variances are beneficial in every situation.
Adverse variances means unfavourable variance which is actual expenses are more than budgted variance.
volume variance relates to Fixed cost absorption, where as controllable variances arise due difference in actual variable spending per activity measure.
efficiency variance, spending variance, production volume variance, variable and fixed components
total master-budget variances
this is why cell aren't goddamn enormors
chemotaxis
should all variances be investigated
An F-test can be used for variances.
Adverse variances means unfavourable variance which is actual expenses are more than budgted variance.
Ratios!! Compare the various ratios with last year's cash flow statement and balance sheet, and look at variances. Then determine why these variances have occurred. Also compare budgeted cash flow to actual cash flow and determine whether these were favorable or u favorable, and again determine why. Please note different industries have different norms for ratios, ie liquid ratio for car sales would be different to supermarket. Good to compare to industry average or like business to determine ratios are on track or way off. This can be used as a management tool to determine action for the following financial periods.
Overhead Variances 13-48 pg 62213-48 Overhead VariancesStudy Appendix 13. Consider the following data for the Rivera Company:Factory OverheadFixed VariableActual incurred $14,200 $13,300Budget for standard hours allowedfor output achieved 12,500 11,000Applied 11,600 11,000Budget for actual hours of input 12,500 11,400From the above information, fill in the blanks below. Be sure to mark your variances F for favorableand U for unfavorable.a. Flexible-budget variance $______ Fixed $______Variable $______b. Production-volume variance $______ Fixed $______Variable $______c. Spending variance $______ Fixed $______Variable $______d. Efficiency variance $______ Fixed $______Variable $______
Price and quantity variances are computed respectively because different managers are usually responsible for buying and for using inputs.
Equal variances, independent observations and normality