Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
These dimensions do not form a triangle.
No. With the given side lengths the sum of the two shorter sides do not exceed the length of the longest side and would not meet to form a triangle
Yes.
No because to form a triangle the sum of its smallest sides must be greater than its longest side.
Yes and the given lengths would form an isosceles triangle.
1.5m
These dimensions do not form a triangle.
That depends on what the side lengths are. Until the side lengths are known, the triangle can only be classified as a triangle.
When two shapes have proportionally equivalent lengths and angles, they are geometrically similar. For example, take a triangle with sides of length 3, 4, and 5. Another triangle with side lengths 6, 8, and 10 would be geometrically similar to it because its angles are the same and its side lengths are proportional.
Yes, an isosceles triangle with two size lengths of 3 and one of 8 :)
No. With the given side lengths the sum of the two shorter sides do not exceed the length of the longest side and would not meet to form a triangle
Yes.
The lengths of the 3 sides of a certain triangle are related as shown below, where n is the length of the shortest side of the triangle.0.5n, 1.5n, 2.5nWhich of these name the lengths of the sides for another triangle, similar to the first triangle, for any value n ≥ 1?
use the pathagory intherum
The triangle with side lengths of 2m, 4m, and 7m does not form a valid triangle. In a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side according to the Triangle Inequality Theorem. In this case, 2m + 4m is less than 7m, violating the theorem. Therefore, a triangle with these side lengths cannot exist in Euclidean geometry.
If its a right angle triangle then its side lengths could be 3, 4 and 5