Any number that is not zero is significant. However, zeros that appear between non-zeros are significant. Even more confusing is that leading zeros are not significant while trailing zeros are. So, it really depends on what you are looking at. And where the zeros are.
The question is based on a fallacy. Volumes can be reported in any number of significant figures.
The least number of significant figures in any number of the problem determines the number of significant figures in the answer.
No. Stating more significant figures in a quantity doesn't guarantee that the figures are true.
It depends on the operation - for multiplication, the ammount of significant figures is the same as the multiple that has the least. Same for division. For subtraction and addition, the significant figures are decided by the least ammount of spaces past the decimal in the answer. For example, 30.7+2.111111111 would be 30.8
Yes, significant figures in a measurement represent the precision of the measurement. The more significant figures a measurement has, the more precise the measurement is considered to be. Significant figures help communicate the level of precision in a measured value.
The greater the number of significant figures, the greater the precision. Each significant figure increases the precision by a factor of ten. For example pi = 3.14 is accurate to 3 significant figures, while pi = 3.14159 with 6 significant figures is a more accurate representation.
Any number that is not zero is significant. However, zeros that appear between non-zeros are significant. Even more confusing is that leading zeros are not significant while trailing zeros are. So, it really depends on what you are looking at. And where the zeros are.
You just did. Here's two more: The number 303 has three significant figures. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were significant figures in the American Revolution.
It varies. Volume may be reported with more or less significant figures. However, in general the result should not have more significant figures than the underlying data - otherwise, it would look more accurate than it really is.
Significant figures are used to receive a more accurate number. To obtain the number you you multiply or divide the quantities, leave as many significant figures in the answer as there are in the quantity with the least number or significant figures. If adding or subtracting quantities, leave the same number of decimal places in the answer as there are in the quantity with the least number of decimal places
The question is based on a fallacy. Volumes can be reported in any number of significant figures.
A significant figure is basically counting how many digits there are: In this case this number is to FOUR significant figures because there are FOUR digits. Here's some more examples: When you have zero's in front of the number, these do not count as digits: so, if you had 0.0034, you only count the 3 and 4 as digits so this would be to TWO significant figures. However, if you have 0.003404, you must count the zero in between the two four's because this is part of the number - there are FOUR significant figures here.
The number -2.006 should be reported with four significant figures. This is because all non-zero digits in the number are considered significant, and the zeros between the decimal point and the non-zero digit are also significant.
The least number of significant figures in any number of the problem determines the number of significant figures in the answer.
Temperatures are typically measured with 1-2 significant figures, as precision beyond that is usually not needed for everyday purposes. However, in scientific contexts, temperatures can be measured with more significant figures depending on the sensitivity of the measuring instrument.
The answer depends on what operations were used. There should normally not be more significant figures in the answer than in any of the numbers used in the calculation.