No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
324 is a perfect square of 18. But it's not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Neither you dunkhead
It it neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
128 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube, it is 2⁷ (2 to the 7th power).
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.