If of triangle ABC and A'B'C' sides AB = A'B' and AC = A'C', and the included angle at A is larger than the included angle at A*, then BC > B'C'.
Proof:
A A'
/|\ /|
/ | \ / |
/ | \ / |
/ | \ B'/ |
B | X \C |C'
D
We construct AD such that AD = A'C' = AC and angle BAD = angle B'A'C'.
Triangles ABD and A'B'C' are congruent. Therefore BD = B'C'.
Let X be the point where the angle bisector of angle DAC meets BC.
From the congruent triangles AXC and AXD (SAS) we have that XD = XC.
Now, by the triangle inequality we have that BX + XD > BD, so BX + XC > BD, and consequently BC > BD = B'C'.
Theorem 8.11 in what book?
I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.
in this theorem we will neglect the given resistance and in next step mean as second step we will solve
Well, this will depend on the length of the sides of the triangle for what postulate or theorem you will be using.
SAS
The theorem emulates the action of a hinge. As the angle of the hinge is increased the distance between the free edges increases.
because it works like a door hinge. When the door hinge is opened wider the angle is greater and when opened less the angle would be lesser.
no
Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.
UVT
Theorem 8.11 in what book?
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
asa theorem
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
HL congruence theorem
I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.