If one factor is 48 and the other is unknown, divide both sides of the equation by 48. 48 x ? = 4608 ? = 96
The equation to solve is given by. |-2 x + 2| -3 = -3 Add 3 to both sides of the equation and simplify. |-2 x + 2| = 0 |-2 x + 2| is equal to 0 if -2 x + 2 = 0. Solve for x to obtain. So, x = 1
You do not "solve" rational numbers. Rational numbers are not a puzzle nor a question nor an equation, so there is nothing to solve. The question is like asking how do you solve a person's name.
Whenever there are polynomials of the form aX2+bX+c=0 then this type of equation is know as a quadratic equation. to solve these we usually break b into two parts such that there product is equal to a*c and I hope you know how to factor polynomials.
110
t - 17 = 48 The first step is to move the -17 to the right side of the equation and end up with: t = 48 + 17. (When you switch sides, the sign changes) To solve the equation: t = 65
You can either do this by trial-and error, or solve the equation n + (n + 2) + (n + 4) = 48.
Sure. You can always 'solve for' a variable, and if it happens to be the only variable in the equation, than that's how you solve the equation.
you don't answer an equation, you solve an equation
Quadratic equations like this one usually have two solution. Sometimes they have one (so-called "double") solution. If you solve it, you'll know for sure.
solve it
If you solve such an equation for "y", you get an equation in the slope-intercept form.
It is not an equation if it does not have an equals sign. You could simplify it but not solve it.
How do you use division to solve a multiplication equation?Answer this question…
you can only solve for one in an equation so it can equal something
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.
it is not an equation (there no equality in it!)