Best Answer

Yes. Their only common factor is the number 1, so that means they are relatively prime.

More answers

No, they are not. They share the factors 2 and 3.

No, they have multiple common factors.

Q: Is 24 and 28 relatively prime?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

No, it is an even number and it is greater than 2 which tells you right away it is not.The only even prime is 2 itself.

It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.

No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.

209 is relatively prime (as is 211).

Any prime number is relatively prime to 7, such as 2, 3, 5, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, ... Because 7 is a prime number, any number that does not have 7 as a factor is relatively prime to 7, such as 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, ...

Related questions

As 13 is prime and is not a factor of 24, then they are relatively prime

13 and 24 are relatively prime.

Yes, they are relatively prime.

No, they are not relatively prime.

Yes, 24 and 77 are relatively prime.

16 and 24 are not relatively prime. They have 2 as a common factor.

No, 28 and 34 are not relatively prime. No pair of even numbers can be relatively prime, as they always share at least one factor (2).

Yes, they are relatively prime.

No, they are not.

No they are not.

No. Even numbers can't be relatively prime to each other.

It can be. 27 is relatively prime to 28.