No, it is an even number and it is greater than 2 which tells you right away it is not.The only even prime is 2 itself.
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.
209 is relatively prime (as is 211).
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
As 13 is prime and is not a factor of 24, then they are relatively prime
13 and 24 are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
Yes, 24 and 77 are relatively prime.
16 and 24 are not relatively prime. They have 2 as a common factor.
No, 28 and 34 are not relatively prime. No pair of even numbers can be relatively prime, as they always share at least one factor (2).
Yes, they are relatively prime.
No, they are not.
No they are not.
No. Even numbers can't be relatively prime to each other.
It can be. 27 is relatively prime to 28.