Let ABC be a triangle. Let D and E be the mid points of AB and AC respectively. Then the mid-line theorem states that DEBC and DE = BC/2.
Extend DE beyond E to F such that DE = EF. Since AE = CE, triangles ADE and CEF are equal, making CFAB (or CFBD, which is the same) because, for the transversal AC, the alternating angles DAE and ECF are equal. Also,CF = AD = BD, such that BDFC is a parallelogram. It follows that BC = DF = 2·DE which is what we set out to prove.Conversely, let D be on AB, E on AC, DEBC and DE = BC/2. Prove that AD = DB and AE = CE.This is because the condition DEBC makes triangles ADE and ABC similar, with implied proportion,AB/AD = AC/AE = BC/DE = 2.It thus follows that AB is twice as long as AD so that D is the midpoint of AB; similarly, E is the midpoint of AC.
Theorem 8.11 in what book?
I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.
in this theorem we will neglect the given resistance and in next step mean as second step we will solve
Well, this will depend on the length of the sides of the triangle for what postulate or theorem you will be using.
SAS
Ms. Schaindlin
Yes, the corollary to one theorem can be used to prove another theorem.
Theorem 8.11 in what book?
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
asa theorem
A theorem to prove. A series of logical statements. A series of reasons for the statements. answer theorem to prove
A segment need not be a bisector. No theorem can be used to prove something that may not be true!
HL congruence theorem
I will give a link that explains and proves the theorem.
Q.e.d.
I have to prove http://s5.tinypic.com/19ldma.jpg http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/9263/mathhlproofou4.jpg without using pythagorean theorem
..?