False
No, the complete graph of 5 vertices is non planar. because we cant make any such complete graph which draw without cross over the edges . if there exist any crossing with respect to edges then the graph is non planar.Note:- a graph which contain minimum one edge from one vertex to another is called as complete graph...
15
yes
A cube is bipartite platonic graph. You can represent it as platonic by drawing one square inside another and connecting respective edges. Start from any vertex, name it A, color it black. Color the adjacent vertices red and name them B, C, D. Take one of the red vertices (i,e, B, C, D)and all adjacent vertices should be black... and so on. You will be able to get cube with no edges between two vertices of same color. This shows it should be bipartite as well as we used only two color to represent graph. Furthermore, put vertices of black and red color in two partitions and connect them with same edges as in the previous graph. Since, there is no edge between two vertices of same color this is bipartite graph as required.
You can use the word "digraph" in a sentence like this: "A digraph is a combination of two letters representing one sound, such as 'sh' in 'ship'."
In an undirected graph, an edge is an unordered pair of vertices. In a directed graph, an edge is an ordered pair of vertices. The ordering of the vertices implies a direction to the edge, that is that it is traversable in one direction only.
If all the vertices and edges of a graph A are in graph B then graph A is a sub graph of B.
In graph theory, a vertex cover is a set of vertices that covers all edges in a graph. The concept of a vertex cover is related to the existence of a Hamiltonian cycle in a graph because if a graph has a Hamiltonian cycle, then its vertex cover must include at least two vertices from each edge in the cycle. This is because a Hamiltonian cycle visits each vertex exactly once, so the vertices in the cycle must be covered by the vertex cover. Conversely, if a graph has a vertex cover that includes at least two vertices from each edge, it may indicate the potential existence of a Hamiltonian cycle in the graph.
To find the number of vertices in an octagonal pyramid using a graph, you can represent the pyramid as a 3D shape with vertices, edges, and faces. An octagonal pyramid has 8 vertices, one at the top (apex) and 8 at the base. You can also draw a graph with each vertex representing a corner of the pyramid and each edge representing a line connecting two vertices. By counting the number of vertices in the graph representation, you can determine that an octagonal pyramid has a total of 9 vertices.
An adjacency list is a data structure used to represent relationships between vertices in a graph. It consists of a list of vertices, where each vertex has a list of its neighboring vertices. This allows for efficient storage and retrieval of information about the connections between vertices in a graph.
An irreducible graph is a graph where every pair of vertices is connected by a path. This means that there are no isolated vertices or disconnected components in the graph. The property of irreducibility ensures that the graph is connected, meaning that there is a path between any two vertices in the graph. This connectivity property is important in analyzing the structure and behavior of the graph, as it allows for the study of paths, cycles, and other connectivity-related properties.
The cycle size of a graph is the number of vertices in the smallest cycle in the graph.
A drawing of a graph or network diagram is a pictorial representation of the vertices and edges of a graph. This drawing should not be confused with the graph itself: very different layouts can correspond to the same graph. In the abstract, all that matters is which pairs of vertices are connected by edges.
An adjacency matrix is a matrix showing which vertices of a graph are adjacent to which other vertices.
False! If the graph is exactly the same, then the x-intercepts will be the same which implies the roots are them same. However, you can have the same roots and different graphs. So while the first statement is true, the converse if not.
Yes.