47 is prime 1x47
when ever you divide fractions you must always flip the fraction you are dividing and change the division sign to multiplication, ex. 1/2 divded by 1 = 2/1 multiplied by 1/1 which equals 2
no even exponent of a real number can ever result in a negative number. If x is a complex number with the real and imaginary part having the same magnitude, then taking that to the fourth power will result in a real number, which is negative.Example: (2 + 2i)4, or (-2 + 2i)4, or (2 - 2i)4, or (-2 - 2i)4, Just take (2 - 2i)4, as one to see how it works. First take (2 - 2i)2, then we'll square that result.(2 - 2i)2 = 4 - 4i - 4i + 4i2 , but i2 is -1, so we have -8i, then square that is 64i2 which is -64.
The reciprocal of a number is simply 1 divided by that number. In this case, the reciprocal of 1.75 would be 1 divided by 1.75, which equals approximately 0.5714. This reciprocal value represents the multiplicative inverse of 1.75, such that when multiplied by 1.75, the result is 1.
Yes it is technically possible to get an IQ result of 1000. However, it is impossibly unlikely. At 60 Standard Deviations above the norm you would be more intelligent than any human who has ever lived or is likely to ever live. In terms of getting that result on an existing test you would also have to complete an entire test at a very young age in a matter of mere seconds.In terms of everyday testing and results, the more practical answer is no. Even Stephen Hawking has only tested slightly over 200.
No, a nonprime number multiplied by a nonprime number will be a nonprime number.
Always.
Yes. For example, 52 ÷ 4 = 13.
810/30=27
No.
No.
2 multiplied by itself 57,885,161 times, less one.
Nothing can be multiplied to get that number. Ex. 7 is a prime number because nothing x nothing will ever equal 7.
A prime number has exactly two factors, 1 and the number itself. 1 is not a prime number, and the product will be a composite number if any other prime is used as a factor and multiplied by another prime.
Well.... it actually depends. like 100 divided by 20 is 5 which is a prime. but 200 divided by 50 is four which is four and not a prime number.
No. If you multiply two prime numbers, any prime numbers, the result will - by definition - not be a prime number. For example, if you multiply 2 x 3, the result will obviously be divisible by 2 and by 3, and therefore, not be a prime number. By the way, one is not usually considered a prime number.
No.