No.
For example, a hexagon with equal angles and sides of lengths a,b,a,b,a,b has rotational symmetry of order 3, but it has no reflection symmetry.
No.
For example, a hexagon with equal angles and sides of lengths a,b,a,b,a,b has rotational symmetry of order 3, but it has no reflection symmetry.
No.
For example, a hexagon with equal angles and sides of lengths a,b,a,b,a,b has rotational symmetry of order 3, but it has no reflection symmetry.
No.
For example, a hexagon with equal angles and sides of lengths a,b,a,b,a,b has rotational symmetry of order 3, but it has no reflection symmetry.
Chat with our AI personalities
No.
For example, a hexagon with equal angles and sides of lengths a,b,a,b,a,b has rotational symmetry of order 3, but it has no reflection symmetry.
The square has 4 sides and has rotational symmetry of order 4. Also, the angle rotation measurement is 90 degrees.
Oh, dude, line symmetry is when you can fold a shape in half and both sides match up perfectly, like a beautiful butterfly. Point symmetry is basically when a shape looks the same even after you give it a little spin, like a merry-go-round that never gets dizzy. So, like, line symmetry is all about folding, and point symmetry is more about twirling.
Yes a rhombus has 2 lines of symmetry. These lines of symmetry join its opposite corners.
The quadrilateral would have to be a parallelogram which is not also a rectangle or a rhombus.
You cannot have one parallel line. There must be another line that it is parallel to. Also, 1 symmetry is meaningless - you can have one axis of symmetry or rotational symmetry of order one. The answer will depend on which one it is.