The easiest way to solve this is just setting up a few equations.
Three consecutive odd integers are: x, x+2, x+4 where x is some odd integer to be determined.
The constraint is: 2*x+3*(x+4) = (x+2) + 6
Expanding this out we have:
2x + 3x + 12 = x + 8
5x+12 = x + 8
4x = -4
x = -1
So the three integers are -1, 1, and 3.
We can check our work again by putting these integers back into the constraint, just to verify no math mistakes (assuming we are setting up the constraint correctly to begin with).
2*(-1) + 3*(3) = 1 + 6
-2 + 9 = 7
7=7 is correct
59,61,63,65 It is 59
For x, which is the largest integer of nconsecutive positive integers of which the smallest is m:x = m + n - 1
The sum of three consecutive integers is -72
There are not two consecutive odd integers. An integer is a whole number and consecutive is something that follows continuously/unbroken, logical sequence. All odd integers will have an even integer in between: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...
The two integers are 6 and 7.
The smallest is 121.
59,61,63,65 It is 59
consecutive integers
For x, which is the largest integer of nconsecutive positive integers of which the smallest is m:x = m + n - 1
"Consecutive" integers are integers that have no other integer between them.
The sum of three consecutive integers is -72
9,11,13
The smallest six consecutive composite integers are:90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95.(And 96 is also composite, for a run of seven consecutive.)Is that what you were asking ?
The integers are 47, 49, 51, and 53. 47 * 53 = 2491
1 is the smallest positive integer. But if you include negative integers, there is no smallest.
Let x equal the smallest integer. The sum will be 3x + 6
The first integer is 17.