base times height
area
depends the size of the rectangular prism work out the length then the width and the height LxWx= volumewhat ur question is asking is basically: whats the volume of a rectangular prism?hope i helped! XD! x
This is not well-worded. The smaller the cubes the more you'd need to fill a container, and the more completely they'd fill it. One large cube would not fill a round container but there might not be room for more than one.
A good arrengenent would be ,Three rows of three. Or 3*3=9 cubic units.
There is no name for it. If you were looking for the answer "capacity" the question is very poorly worded.
The answer depends on how large the prism is.
area
depends the size of the rectangular prism work out the length then the width and the height LxWx= volumewhat ur question is asking is basically: whats the volume of a rectangular prism?hope i helped! XD! x
This is not well-worded. The smaller the cubes the more you'd need to fill a container, and the more completely they'd fill it. One large cube would not fill a round container but there might not be room for more than one.
A good arrengenent would be ,Three rows of three. Or 3*3=9 cubic units.
Sure, if each of the dimensions (length, width, and height) is an odd number of units.
There is no name for it. If you were looking for the answer "capacity" the question is very poorly worded.
Eight half inch cubes would fill a one inch cube.
There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
Volume
The answer depends on the exact size of the solid figure.
I donk know.