base times height
area
depends the size of the rectangular prism work out the length then the width and the height LxWx= volumewhat ur question is asking is basically: whats the volume of a rectangular prism?hope i helped! XD! x
This is not well-worded. The smaller the cubes the more you'd need to fill a container, and the more completely they'd fill it. One large cube would not fill a round container but there might not be room for more than one.
A good arrengenent would be ,Three rows of three. Or 3*3=9 cubic units.
Eight half inch cubes would fill a one inch cube.
To determine how many small cubes are needed to fill a right rectangular prism, you first need to calculate the volume of the prism by multiplying its length, width, and height. Then, calculate the volume of one small cube by cubing its side length. Finally, divide the volume of the prism by the volume of the small cube to find the total number of cubes required.
The answer depends on how large the prism is.
area
depends the size of the rectangular prism work out the length then the width and the height LxWx= volumewhat ur question is asking is basically: whats the volume of a rectangular prism?hope i helped! XD! x
This is not well-worded. The smaller the cubes the more you'd need to fill a container, and the more completely they'd fill it. One large cube would not fill a round container but there might not be room for more than one.
A good arrengenent would be ,Three rows of three. Or 3*3=9 cubic units.
Sure, if each of the dimensions (length, width, and height) is an odd number of units.
Cubes, rectangular prisms, and cylinders are solid shapes that can be stacked up repeatedly to fill space without leaving gaps. These shapes can tessellate in three dimensions to create a continuous structure.
Eight half inch cubes would fill a one inch cube.
Volume
There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.There is no specific name.I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
The number of cubes that would fill a container is called the volume of the container. Volume is a measurement of the amount of space an object occupies in three-dimensional space. It is typically measured in cubic units, such as cubic centimeters or cubic meters, depending on the size of the container.