Suppose x and y are any two elements of the set.Then x = 3m + 1 and y = 3n + 1 for some integers m and n.
Then x*y = (3m + 1)*(3n + 1) = 9mn + 3m + 3n + 1 = 3*(3mn + m + n) + 1.
Since m and n are integers, mn+ m + n is also an integer = p, say.
Then x*y = 3p + 1.
That is the set is closed under multiplication.
Yes
The numbers are not closed under addition because whole numbers, even integers, and natural numbers are closed.
No. One of the group axioms is that each element must have an inverse element. This is not the case with integers. In other words, you can't solve an equation like: 5 times "n" = 1 in the set of integers.
NO. Certainly not. Additive inverse and Multiplicative inverse doesn't exist for many elements.
Any set where the result of the multiplication of any two members of the set is also a member of the set. Well known examples are: the natural numbers (ℕ), the integers (ℤ), the rational numbers (ℚ), the real numbers (ℝ) and the complex numbers (ℂ) - all closed under multiplication.
No.
They are not the same!The set of integers is closed under multiplication but not under division.Multiplication is commutative, division is not.Multiplication is associative, division is not.
Yes!
Yes!
The set of integers is not closed under multiplication and so is not a field.
Yes
Yes.
Yes.
No, it is not.
1 No. 2 No. 3 Yes.
No. The set does not include inverses.
The numbers are not closed under addition because whole numbers, even integers, and natural numbers are closed.