A nonzero multiple of a number is a multiple which is not equal to 0.
-1
No. 740 → 7 + 4 + 0 = 11 11 → 1 + 1 = 2 which is not one of 3, 6, 9 so 740 is not a multiple of 3.
our teacher said"0 is not a multiple of 9"
To determine if a number is a multiple of 3, we can add up the digits of the number. For 4036, we have 4+0+3+6 = 13. Since 13 is not divisible by 3, 4036 is not a multiple of 3.
No.15 = 3 x 5So for 200 to be a multiple of 15, it must be a multiple of both 3 and 5:2 + 0 + 0 = 2 which is not a multiple of 3 so 200 is not a multiple of 3.200 ends in 0, so it is a multiple of 5.Thus 200 is a multiple of 5, but not a multiple of 3; so it is not a multiple of 15.
No.
A nonzero multiple of a number is a multiple which is not equal to 0.
No, one is not a multiple of 3. A number is considered a multiple of 3 if it can be evenly divided by 3 without leaving a remainder. Since 1 divided by 3 equals 0 with a remainder of 1, it is not a multiple of 3.
To determine if a number is a multiple of three, we typically check if the sum of its digits is divisible by three. In this case, 1 + 0 + 0 + 3 = 4, which is not divisible by three. Therefore, 1003 is not a multiple of three.
It depends for example: 0, 3, 6 This times table starts with 0. 3, 6, 9 This one does to it is just not included in the times table. So yes 0 is a multiple of all numbers.
2+7+0=9 and 9 is divisible by 3. Therefore 270 is a multiple of 3.This works for 3,9 and 27.
The sum of the digits of a multiple of 3 sum to a number that is itself divisible by 3. Example : 153 : 1 + 5 + 3 = 9 which is divisible by 3 so 153 is a multiple of 3. But : 206 : 2 + 0 + 6 = 8 shows that 206 is NOT a multiple of 3.
8+4+0=12 1+2=3 Yes it is.
By 2 but not by 3. 2690 is a multiple of 2 because it ends in 0 but it isn't a multiple of 3 because 2 + 6 + 9 = 17 and 17 isn't a multiple of 3
0 is a multiple of any number, since n*0 = 0 so 6*0 = 0 and 0 IS a multiple.
-1