888 because 8 is divisble by 2 and 8+8+8 is 24 24 is divisible by 3 then it is divisible by 2 and 3 then it is divisble by 6....
To determine if a number is divisible by both 2 and 3, we need to check if it is divisible by the least common multiple of 2 and 3, which is 6. 4671 is not divisible by 6 because the sum of its digits (4 + 6 + 7 + 1 = 18) is not divisible by 3, making 4671 not divisible by 3. 3858 is divisible by 6 because the sum of its digits (3 + 8 + 5 + 8 = 24) is divisible by 3, making 3858 divisible by 3 and 2. 6494 is not divisible by 6 because it is an odd number, making it not divisible by 2, and the sum of its digits (6 + 4 + 9 + 4 = 23) is not divisible by 3, making 6494 not divisible by 3.
2 or 8
No whatever 2 and 3 are divisible by then that number is divisible by 6
352 is divisible by 1, 2, 4 and 8; not by 3, 5, 6 and 9
888 because 8 is divisble by 2 and 8+8+8 is 24 24 is divisible by 3 then it is divisible by 2 and 3 then it is divisble by 6....
are 2 and 8 divisible by 4
1+4+3 = 8 which is not divisible by 3, so 143 is not divisible by 3. 8 ÷ 3 has remainder 2, so 143 ÷ 3 has remainder 2.
no because: 1+4+1+2=8 and 8 is not divisible by 3.
Of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8, the smallest number divisible by 2 is 2.
Numbers divisible by 6 will have at least one 2 and one 3 as prime factors because 2 x 3 = 6. The same is true for 2, 4 and 8. Numbers divisible by 4 are also divisible by 2. Numbers divisible by 8 are also divisible by 4 and 2.
1, 2, 0, 3 and 8 are not divisible by 4 and/or 9. Neither is 12038.
To determine if a number is divisible by both 2 and 3, we need to check if it is divisible by the least common multiple of 2 and 3, which is 6. 4671 is not divisible by 6 because the sum of its digits (4 + 6 + 7 + 1 = 18) is not divisible by 3, making 4671 not divisible by 3. 3858 is divisible by 6 because the sum of its digits (3 + 8 + 5 + 8 = 24) is divisible by 3, making 3858 divisible by 3 and 2. 6494 is not divisible by 6 because it is an odd number, making it not divisible by 2, and the sum of its digits (6 + 4 + 9 + 4 = 23) is not divisible by 3, making 6494 not divisible by 3.
2 or 8
No whatever 2 and 3 are divisible by then that number is divisible by 6
Yes, 8 is divisible by any number but, of your list, the only numbers by which 8 is EVENLY divisible are 1, 2, 4, and 8.
6+8+2= 16, 16 isn't divisible by 3, so no, 682 is not