To determine if a number is divisible by both 2 and 3, we need to check if it is divisible by the least common multiple of 2 and 3, which is 6.
4671 is not divisible by 6 because the sum of its digits (4 + 6 + 7 + 1 = 18) is not divisible by 3, making 4671 not divisible by 3.
3858 is divisible by 6 because the sum of its digits (3 + 8 + 5 + 8 = 24) is divisible by 3, making 3858 divisible by 3 and 2.
6494 is not divisible by 6 because it is an odd number, making it not divisible by 2, and the sum of its digits (6 + 4 + 9 + 4 = 23) is not divisible by 3, making 6494 not divisible by 3.
Any number that is divisible by both 2 and 3 is divisible by 6.
The smallest number that is divisible by both 34 and 35 is 1,190.
Yes, because 12 is divisible by 2 and 6.
is 567 divisible by both 2 and 9
It is not divisible by 6. Note:If a number id divisible by 6 then it must be divisible by both 2 and 3.The above number is not divisible by 2 and 3 either.
No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.
No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.No, both are divisible by 2.
Both are divisible by 5.
They are both divisible by 13.
They are both divisible by 1 and 3
No,because 45 is not divisible by both 2 and 3. In order for a number to be divisible by 6 it has to be divisible by both 2 and 3.
Any number that is divisible by both 2 and 3 is divisible by 6.
They are both divisible by 1 and 19.
Something divisible by 6 has to be divisible by both 2 and 3. and that just answers that anything disible by 6 is divisible by 2
If a number is divisible by both 8 and 11, it will be divisible by 88.
They're both divisible by 1,3,7, and 21.
The smallest number that is divisible by both 34 and 35 is 1,190.