yes it is
No.
An integer n is odd if and only if n^2 is odd.
A bi-conditional statement can be true or false. If it is true, then both forward and backward statements are true. See Bi-conditional StatementIn English grammarThe statement, Love you! could be true too if said/written backward as You love!
An identity.
Conditional statements are also called "if-then" statements.One example: "If it snows, then they cancel school."The converse of that statement is "If they cancel school, then it snows."The inverse of that statement is "If it does not snow, then they do not cancel school.The contrapositive combines the two: "If they do not cancel school, then it does not snow."In mathematics:Statement: If p, then q.Converse: If q, then p.Inverse: If not p, then not q.Contrapositive: If not q, then not p.If the statement is true, then the contrapositive is also logically true. If the converse is true, then the inverse is also logically true.
always true
always true
This is not always true.
A biconditional is the conjunction of a conditional statement and its converse.
No. Consider the statement "If I'm alive, then I'm not dead." That statement is true. The converse is "If I'm not dead, then I'm alive.", which is also true.
true
No, the conditional statement and its converse are not negations of each other. A conditional statement has the form "If P, then Q," while its converse is "If Q, then P." The negation of a conditional statement would be "P is true and Q is false," which is distinct from the converse. Thus, they represent different logical relationships.
The statement is false. The conditional statement "If P, then Q" and its converse "If Q, then P" are distinct statements, but the negation of the converse would be "It is not the case that if Q, then P." Thus, the conditional and the negation of the converse are not equivalent or directly related.
A conditional statement is true if, and only if, its contrapositive is true.
the converse of this conditional is true
An example of a true conditional with a false converse is: "If it is raining, then the ground is wet." This statement is true because rain typically causes the ground to be wet. However, the converse, "If the ground is wet, then it is raining," is false because the ground could be wet for other reasons, such as someone watering the garden.
No.