Miguel has a square. From the information we know that the side length of the square is 12 cm. Since we are dealing with a square, we know all sides are 12 cm.
Miguel cuts the square along the diagonal. Miguel now has two right triangles.
We know that two sides of each of the right triangles have lengths of 12 cm. We don't know what the other side (diagonal side) is, so we must use the Pythagorean Theorem
a2 + b2 = c2
Let side one be "a" and side two be "b", "c" will be the diagonal side.
122 + 122 = c2
144 + 144 = c2
√288 = c2
The square root of 288 is 16.97
Now we know that the perimeter equals 12+12+16.97 = 40.97 cm
40.97 rounded to the nearest tenth equals 41.0 cm
A square bisected by a diagonal produces two right angle triangles, therefore you will solve for the hypotenuse of the triangle: If the perimeter is 16, then each side is 16/4 or 4 inches Thus you have a right triangle that has an opposite leg of 4 and an adjacent leg of 4. Enter pythagoras: h = squareroot(opp^2 + adj^2) = sqr(4^2 + 4^2 ) = sqr(32) = 5.65685425 h = 5.656854 inches.
There are many different triangles with a base of 10 km and height of 12 km, and they have different perimeters. The smallest perimeter occurs if the third vertex is directly above the midpoint of the base; then the altitude from that vertex divides the triangle into two congruent triangles with sides 5, 12, and (by the Pythagorean theorem) 13. The sides of length 12 are shared, so the perimeter of the triangle is 36 km in this case. If the third vertex is moved to one side but kept at the same height, the perimeter increases; there is no upper bound on the perimeter that can be achieved.
There is only one equilateral triangle with a perimeter of 60 units. Its side lengths are integers.
There is no reason for the perimeter of a triangle to have any relation to the perimeter of an unrelated rectangle!
there are 27 triangles in a triangle
right triangle ( triangles with a right angle)
With great difficulty because triangles do not have diagonals
no but the diagonal divides the square into two equilateral triangles. An equilateral triangle is a triangle that has two sides of the same length
16
Let's denote the perimeter of the first triangle as P. Since the triangles are congruent, the perimeter of the second triangle is also P. The sum of their perimeters is then 2P. According to the given statement, this sum is three times the perimeter of the first triangle. So we have the equation 2P = 3P. Simplifying, we find that P = 0, which is not a valid solution. Therefore, there is no triangle for which the sum of the perimeters of two congruent triangles is three times the perimeter of the first triangle.
The perimeter of any triangle is the sum of its 3 sides
You find the three sides of the triangle, and assure that they are all in the same unit, and then add the sides together to find the perimeter of the triangle.
It is necessary to mention that the two triangles are similar.Let the perimeter of the triangle MNP be x cm.Since the triangles XYZ and MNP are similar triangles,8/12 = x/80 (multiply both sides by 80)640/12 = x53.3333... = x53 3/9 = x53 1/3 = xThus, the perimeter of the triangle MNP is 53 1/3 cm.
You can't tell. There are an infinite number of triangles that all have a perimeter of 144.
Triangles don't have a diameter. They have a base and a height.
They don't always- they don't always 'has' a smaller perimeter than other triangles. A triangle can be absolutely any size as long as it has three sides and angles that add to 180 degrees
If a "1 inch triangle" means a triangle each of whose sides is 1 inch, then there is no answer to the question. These are equilateral triangles and equilateral triangles can tesselate to form a larger equilateral triangle. The fact that the large triangle is equilateral means that its three sides are equal so that its perimeter ie the sum of the three sides must be divisible by 3. 20 is not divisible by 3.