answersLogoWhite

0

Prove: [ P -> Q AND R -> S AND (P OR R) ] -> (Q OR S) -> NOT, ---

1. P -> Q ___ hypothesis 2. R -> S ___ hypothesis 3. P OR R ___ hypothesis 4. ~P OR Q ___ implication from hyp 1. 5. ~R OR S ___ implication from hyp 2 6. ~P OR Q OR S ___ addition to 4. 7. ~R OR Q OR S ___ addition to 5. 8. Let T == (Q OR S) ___ substitution 9. (~P OR T) AND (~R OR T) ___ Conjunction 6,7 10. T OR (~P AND ~R) ___ Distribution from 9 11. T OR ~(P OR R) ___ De Morgan's theorem 12. Let M == (P OR R) ___ substitution

13. (T OR ~M) AND M ___ conjunction 11, hyp 3 From there, you can use distribution to get (T AND M) OR (~M AND M). The contradiction goes away leaving you with T AND M, which can simplify to T.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Other Math

What is the proof of constructive dilemma in logic NOT with truth table if p is q and if r is s and either p or r is true therefore either q or s is true?

Please use the discussion area to explain this fascinating question Constructive Dilemma Proof: 1. ( A -> B ) Premise 2. ( C -> D ) Premise 3. ( A or C ) Premise 4. ( - B -> - A ) 1 , Contraposition 5. ( - A -> C ) 3 , Implication 6. ( - B -> C ) 4 , 5 Chain Argument 7. ( - B -> D ) 6 , 2 Chain Argument 8. ( B or D ) 7 Implication , Q.E.D.


Is the square root of a 143 a irrational number?

Yes. The square root of a positive integer can ONLY be either:* An integer (in this case, it isn't), OR * An irrational number. The proof is basically the same as the proof used in high school algebra, to prove that the square root of 2 is irrational.


Is nsinn properly divergent?

No. The sequence (n*sin(n)) is not properly divergent. To be properly divergent it must either "tend to" +inf or -inf. We say that (xn) tends to +inf if for every real number a there exists a natural number N such that if n>=N, then xn>a. It is clear that no such N exists for all real numbers because n*sin(n) oscillates (because of the sin(n)). Therefore (n*sin(n)) is not properly divergent. This is not a rigorous proof but the definition of proper divergence is precise and can be used for any proof dealing with proper divergence.


What is another name for a proof of contradiction?

Proof by contradiction is also known by its Latin equivalent, reductio ad absurdum.


If whiskey is 90 proof what is the percentage?

45% The percentage of alcohol is always 1/2 of the proof.

Related Questions

What is the name of the branch of math that has to do with reasoning and proof?

Mathematical logic and proof theory (a branch of mathematical logic) for proof


How can I generate a predicate logic proof using the Predicate Logic Proof Generator?

To generate a predicate logic proof using the Predicate Logic Proof Generator, you need to input the premises and the conclusion of the argument in the appropriate format. The tool will then guide you through the steps to construct a valid proof by applying rules of inference and logical equivalences.


What can justify the steps of a proof?

Mathematical logic.


In a geometric proof what can be used to explain a statement?

Axioms and logic (and previously proved theorems).


An argument that uses logic to show that a conclusion is true?

Proof


Logic and formal proof in math have been in existence since the time of the ancient Greeks?

True or False. Logic and proof in math have been in existence sine the time of the ancient Greeks. true


Have logic and formal proof in math only been around for about 100 years?

no


Can you also prove that 1 equals 0?

In normal math, 1 is not equal to 0, so any "proof" that they are equal either uses non-standard definitions, or it is based on faulty logic.


What are the different types of language proof and logic solutions available for solving complex problems?

Different types of language, proof, and logic solutions for solving complex problems include formal logic, mathematical proofs, programming languages, and symbolic logic. These tools help break down problems into logical steps and provide a systematic approach to finding solutions.


Logic and formal proof in math have been around for over 2000 years?

true


What can you use to explain the statement in the geometric proof?

Yo could try using logic.


Can the sentential logic proof solver accurately determine the validity of a given argument?

Yes, the sentential logic proof solver can accurately determine the validity of a given argument by analyzing the logical structure of the statements and determining if the conclusion logically follows from the premises.