0
Give an example where displacement is zero but distance is not?
Wiki User
∙ 17y ago
when the body moves circularly from a point 'A' to a then the displacement will be zero(displacement is the shortest diatance from the initial point to final point) and the distance will not be zero.
Wiki User
∙ 17y ago
If an object moves in a circular path and returns to its starting point, the displacement is zero because the final position is the same as the initial position. However, the distance traveled along the circular path is not zero, it is equal to the circumference of the circle.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can a body have distance without displacement give an example?
Yes, a body can have distance without displacement. For example, if a car drives in a circular track and returns to its starting point, it will have covered a certain distance during the trip, but its displacement will be zero since it ended up at the same position where it started.
An object has moved though a distance can it have zero displacement it yes support your answer with an example?
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/An_object_has_moved_though_a_distance_can_it_have_zero_displacement_it_yes_support_your_answer_with_an_example" Yes If a body travel a distance S from X to Y and return to X then distance travelled is 2S but displacement is zero In a uniform circular motion, the distance travelled by a body in one revolution is 2Ï€r but displacement is zero
Can the distance travelled by a particle be zero when displacement is not zero?
Yes, the distance travelled by a particle can be zero even when the displacement is not zero. This can happen when the particle moves back and forth along the same path, resulting in a net displacement of zero but no actual distance covered.
Is it possible that displasment is zero but not the distance?
Yes, it is possible for displacement to be zero but the distance traveled to be non-zero. This occurs when an object moves back and forth between two points, resulting in zero net displacement but a non-zero total distance covered.
Is it possible displacement be zero but distance not?
Yes, it is possible for displacement to be zero while distance is not. This can happen when an object moves in different directions and its total movement results in a non-zero distance, while the net change in position (displacement) from start to finish is zero.
Can a body have distance without displacement give an example?
Yes, a body can have distance without displacement. For example, if a car drives in a circular track and returns to its starting point, it will have covered a certain distance during the trip, but its displacement will be zero since it ended up at the same position where it started.
An object has moved though a distance can it have zero displacement it yes support your answer with an example?
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/An_object_has_moved_though_a_distance_can_it_have_zero_displacement_it_yes_support_your_answer_with_an_example" Yes If a body travel a distance S from X to Y and return to X then distance travelled is 2S but displacement is zero In a uniform circular motion, the distance travelled by a body in one revolution is 2Ï€r but displacement is zero
Can the distance travelled by the particle be zero when the displacement is not zero?
The distance travelled by a particle cannot be zero when displacement is not zero because unlike distance which is a scalar, displacement is a vector quantity implying that it has both direction and magnitude.
Can the distance travelled by a particle be zero when displacement is not zero?
Yes, the distance travelled by a particle can be zero even when the displacement is not zero. This can happen when the particle moves back and forth along the same path, resulting in a net displacement of zero but no actual distance covered.
Is it possible that displasment is zero but not the distance?
Yes, it is possible for displacement to be zero but the distance traveled to be non-zero. This occurs when an object moves back and forth between two points, resulting in zero net displacement but a non-zero total distance covered.
Can displacement can be zero even when distance is not zero?
No. Distance can be greater than displacement, but not less. The magnitude of the displacement between two points is also the minimum possible distance of a path between the same points.However, the displacement can be zero if the distance is not if the object's starting point and ending point are the same.
Is it possible displacement be zero but distance not?
Yes, it is possible for displacement to be zero while distance is not. This can happen when an object moves in different directions and its total movement results in a non-zero distance, while the net change in position (displacement) from start to finish is zero.
Examples of the displacement of an object may be 0 when distance traveled by it is not 0?
Displacement is a vector quantity that measures the change in position of an object. It can be zero even if the distance traveled is not zero when the object moves back to its initial position. For example, if a car drives in a complete circle and returns to its starting point, its displacement is zero since the initial and final positions are the same, even though the distance traveled is not zero.
Can displacement be zero even if distance is non zero?
On a three dimensional basis yes it can. Fir instance, if an object is moving directly towards or away from you the angular displacement can be zero though the distance displacement changes.
Are distance and displacement the same?
distance travel led by a particle in a given interval of time is known as displacement. displacement=distance traveled by time taken.Displacement may be zero. it is path length which a particle travels.distance should not be zero.
Will the displacement of a moving object in a given interval of time is zerowould the distance traveled by the object also be zero justify?
Not necessarily. Displacement looks at the change in position from the start to end points regardless of the path taken, while distance traveled looks at the actual path length. If the object moves back and forth within the interval, the displacement could be zero but the distance traveled would not be zero.
Is the distance coveredby body may be greater than magnitude of the displacement?
Yes distance will be equal or more than the magnitude of displacement. Distance cannot be less than the magnitude of displacement in any way. For example if a body goes around a circle completing one full round then distance covered will be the circumference ie 2pi r But displacement is zero. As the starting and stopping point are one and the same, the distance between initial and final is zero.
