answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

1601

User Avatar

Adolf Rohan

Lvl 10
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

It is not possible to have any integral multiples of 1600 whose sum is -1. The sum can be 0 or any multiple of 1600, but other sums are not possible.

If non-integral multiples are permitted then there are an infinite number of possible answers.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are to multiples of 1600 that sum to -1?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the sum of the first 1600 consecutive odd numbers?

The sum of consecutive numbers (starting with 1), is the square of the number of terms you sum, in this case 1600. 1600^2 = 2,560,000


What is the sum of the first 15 multiples of 8?

Sum of the first 15 positive integers is 15*(15+1)/2 = 120 Sum of the first 15 multiples of 8 is 8*120 = 960


The sum of three consecutive multiples of 6 is 666find the multiples?

The sum of three consecutive multiples of 6 is 666, the multiples are 216, 222 and 228.


What is the sum of the first 10 multiples of 3?

The sum of the first 10 multiples of 3 is 165.


What are multiples of 400?

multiples of 400: 400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2400, ...


What is the sum of all the multiples of 3 and 5 below 500?

The sum of all multiples of 3 below 500 is the sum of 3 + 6 + ... + 498 = 41583The sum of all multiples of 5 below 500 is the sum of 5 + 10 + ... + 495 = 24750Depending upon the interpretation of "of 3 and 5", the answer is one of:The sum of all multiples of both 3 and 5 below 500 is the sum of 15 + 30 + ... + 495 = 8415The sum of all multiples of 3 below 500 and all multiples of 5 below 500 is 41583 + 24750 = 66333Since the multiples of both 3 and 5 (that is 15, 30, ...) have been counted twice - once in the multiples of 3 and once in the multiples of 5 - the sum of all multiples of 3 or 5 or both below 500 is 41583 + 24750 - 8415 = 57918I have emphasised the word below with regard to 500 since 500 is a multiple of 5, but 500 is not below (less than) itself, that is the multiples are of the numbers 1, 2, 3, ..., 499. If the question was intended to mean less than or equal to 500, add an extra 500 to the multiples of 5 above, making the sum of the multiples of 5 be 25250 and the final sums (1) 8415, (2) 66833, (3) 58418.


Why all multiples of odd natural numbers other than multiples of 1 can be written as the sum of consecutive natural numbers?

That isn't true.


What is the sum of the first 25 multiples of 4?

Sum of first 25 multiples of 44+8+12....100taking 4 common4(1+2+3+4....+25) = 4*325 =1300


What is noticeable about the sum in the multiples of 9?

That the sum of its digits add up to 9 as for example 9*9 = 81 and 8+1 = 9


Which expression represents the sum of the first n multiples of 8?

4*n(n+1)


What is the sum of the first 2 multiples of 6?

1 x 6 = 62 x 6 = 12The sum of 12 + 6 = 18


What is the sum of all the factors of 1600?

3937