Best Answer

Any number that is not a multiple of 7.

Any number that is not a multiple of 7.

Any number that is not a multiple of 7.

Any number that is not a multiple of 7.

More answers

Any number that is not a multiple of 7.

Q: What number is relatively prime to 7?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

No, 7 and 14 are not relatively prime. They share the factor 7.

Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.

A number cannot be relatively prime number by itself. It can only be relatively prime in the context of (relativeto) another number. That requires the two numbers not to have any prime factors in common.

It can be. 16 is relatively prime with 25.

Two [or more] numbers are said to be relatively prime or coprime if they have no factor in common [other than 1]. They need not be prime numbers.Equivalently, a set of numbers is relatively prime if and only if their GCF is 1.Thus, 2*7 = 14 and 3*5 = 15Neither 14 nor 15 is a prime but they are relatively prime since they do not have a factor in common.

Related questions

Two number are said to be "relatively prime" if they have no common factors - of course, other than the trivial factor 1. Even a prime number is not "relatively prime" to itself, since the prime number itself is the common factor. For example, the common factor of 7 and 7 is 7. Thus, the only situation I can think of where a number has no common factor with itself is that the number is 1.

As 77 = 7 x 11, any number that is not a multiple of 7 or 11 is relatively prime to 77, e.g. 25, 38, 123

Yes, they are relatively prime.

Yes, they are relatively prime.

No, 7 and 14 are not relatively prime. They share the factor 7.

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.

No. They have more than just the number 1 as common factors. They also have the number 7. Relatively prime numbers only share the number 1 as a common factor.

Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.

No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.

A number is relatively prime to another number or set of numbers when their GCF is 1.

A number cannot be relatively prime number by itself. It can only be relatively prime in the context of (relativeto) another number. That requires the two numbers not to have any prime factors in common.

Two [or more] numbers are said to be relatively prime or coprime if they have no factor in common [other than 1]. They need not be prime numbers.Equivalently, a set of numbers is relatively prime if and only if their GCF is 1.Thus, 2*7 = 14 and 3*5 = 15Neither 14 nor 15 is a prime but they are relatively prime since they do not have a factor in common.