answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

True because the point of the hypothesis test is to figure out the probability of the null hypothesis being true or false. If it is tested and it is true, then you do not reject but you reject it, when it is false.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If the null hypothesis is true and the researchers do not reject it then a correct decision has been made?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do scientists decide whether or not to reject or accept a hypothesis?

if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect


If the decision in the hypothesis test of the population correlation coefficient is to reject the null hypothesis. What can you conclude about the correlation in the population?

is notzero


Difference between acceptance and rejection region?

Some researchers say that a hypothesis test can have one of two outcomes: you accept the null hypothesis or you reject the null hypothesis. Many statisticians, however, take issue with the notion of "accepting the null hypothesis." Instead, they say: you reject the null hypothesis or you fail to reject the null hypothesis. Why the distinction between "acceptance" and "failure to reject?" Acceptance implies that the null hypothesis is true. Failure to reject implies that the data are not sufficiently persuasive for us to prefer the alternative hypothesis over the null hypothesis.


In a hypothesis testing the alternative hypothesis is assumed?

No. The null hypothesis is assumed to be correct unless there is sufficient evidence from the sample and the given criteria (significance level) to reject it.


When you reject the Null Hypothesis that means that the Null Hypothesis cannot be correct?

No. Rejecting the Null Hypothesis means that there is a high degree of probability that it is not correct. This degree of probability is the critical level that you choose for the test statistic. However, there is still a small probability that the null hypothesis was correct.


Is the null hypothesis considered correct until proven otherwise?

No. The null hypothesis is not considered correct. It is an assumption, and hypothesis testing is a consistent meand of determining whether the data is sufficiently strong to say that it may be untrue. The data either supports the alternative hypothesis or it fails to reject it. See examples in links. Also note this quote from Wikipedia: "Statistical hypothesis testing is used to make a decision about whether the data contradicts the null hypothesis: this is called significance testing. A null hypothesis is never proven by such methods, as the absence of evidence against the null hypothesis does not establish it."


Is the critical region the values of the test statistics for which the null hypothesis will reject?

The null hypothesis will not reject - it is a hypothesis and is not capable of rejecting anything. The critical region consists of the values of the test statistic where YOU will reject the null hypothesis in favour of the expressed alternative hypothesis.


When do we reject a hypothesis?

When we've proven that the hypothesis is false !


If we reject the null hypothesis what can we conclude about the alpha risk?

If we reject the null hypothesis, we conclude that the alternative hypothesis which is the alpha risk is true. The null hypothesis is used in statistics.


What do you mean when you reject a hypothesis on the basis of sample?

alternitive hypothesis


What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?

the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.


Would I accept or reject the null hypothesis if the probability of the obtained statistic is 0.001 and alpha is 0.05?

You should reject the null hypothesis.