Want this question answered?
It is not possible to answer the question because there is no equation - only an expression.
The question contains an expression, not an equation. An expression does not have a graph. Furthermore, even if it were an equation, its form suggests that it would be a linear equation and a linear equation does not open in any direction.
Since the function depends on 4 variables (assuming that p and P are the same variable), the full graph would require 5 dimensions. You can, however, graph something like a cross-section for the graph, in the sense that you keep most of the variables constant, and study the dependency of the function on a single variable at a time.
It is a straight line with gradient -A/B and intercept C/B.
FALSE
You can do the equation Y 2x plus 3 on a graph. On this graph the Y would equal 5 and X would equal to 0.
down
2,4
The equation you have given, y + 2 = 7, does not describe a line, it describes the number 5. You would not graph a single number, there is nothing to graph.
It is not possible to answer the question because there is no equation - only an expression.
The vertex of the graph Y 3 X-12 plus 2 would be -1/3 and -4/3. This is taught in math.
Upwards.
Interpreting that function as y=x2+2x+1, the graph of this function would be a parabola that opens upward. It would be equivalent to y=(x+1)2. Its vertex would be at (-1,0) and this vertex would be the parabola's only zero.
The question contains an expression, not an equation. An expression does not have a graph. Furthermore, even if it were an equation, its form suggests that it would be a linear equation and a linear equation does not open in any direction.
You move the graph upwards by 2 units.
It would be less steep.
It would be shifted down