False.
The question consists of two parts:
- a number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2.
- a number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? This is true but the false part makes the whole statement false.
True. Since 6 is divisible by 2, any number that is divisible by 6 will automatically be divisible by 2.
False. An enormous number of them are divisible by three.
False, 40 and 80 are examples of numbers ending in 0 and yet evenly divisible by 8
true
true
If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.
True. Since 6 is divisible by 2, any number that is divisible by 6 will automatically be divisible by 2.
True
How can the following definition be written correctly as a biconditional statement? An odd integer is an integer that is not divisible by two. (A+ answer) An integer is odd if and only if it is not divisible by two
False. An enormous number of them are divisible by three.
91 x 1 = 91. 13 x 7 = 91. Prime numbers are only divisible by themselves & 1. False 91 is not a prime number.
False, 40 and 80 are examples of numbers ending in 0 and yet evenly divisible by 8
true
true
the answer is no...............................
Look at the statement If 9 is an odd number, then 9 is divisible by 2. The first part is true and second part is false so logically the statement is false. The contrapositive is: If 9 is not divisible by 2, then 9 is not an odd number. The first part is true, the second part is false so the statement is true. Now the converse of the contrapositive If 9 is not an odd number, then 9 is not divisible by two. The first part is false and the second part is true so it is false. The original statement is if p then q,the contrapositive is if not q then not p and the converse of that is if not p then not q
True. The result is 7,031.