The variable term, X^3, is a third order polynomial term and will render three solutions, though one of those may be zero.
Without an equality sign the given terms can't be considered to be an equation and so therefore no solutions are possible.
A polynomial discriminant is defined in terms of the difference in the roots of the polynomial equation. Since a binomial has only one root, there is nothing to take its difference from and so in such a situation, the discriminant is a meaningless concept.
A single linear equation in two variables has infinitely many solutions. Two linear equations in two variables will usually have a single solution - but it is also possible that they have no solution, or infinitely many solutions.
None because without an equality sign it is not an equation and so therefore no solutions are possible.
To determine whether a polynomial equation has imaginary solutions, you must first identify what type of equation it is. If it is a quadratic equation, you can use the quadratic formula to solve for the solutions. If the equation is a cubic or higher order polynomial, you can use the Rational Root Theorem to determine if there are any imaginary solutions. The Rational Root Theorem states that if a polynomial equation has rational solutions, they must be a factor of the constant term divided by a factor of the leading coefficient. If there are no rational solutions, then the equation has imaginary solutions. To use the Rational Root Theorem, first list out all the possible rational solutions. Then, plug each possible rational solution into the equation and see if it is a solution. If there are any solutions, then the equation has imaginary solutions. If not, then there are no imaginary solutions.
As stated in the attached link, there are three possible discriminant conditions: Positive, Zero, or Negative. If the discriminant is negative, there are no real solutions but there are two imaginary solutions. So, yes there are solutions if the discriminant is negative. The solutions are imaginary, which is perfectly acceptable as solutions.
An equation with a degree of three typically has three solutions. However, it is possible for one or more of those solutions to be repeated or complex.
The variable term, X^3, is a third order polynomial term and will render three solutions, though one of those may be zero.
Yes and yes. eg x = y + 1 has an infinite number of solutions, and {sin(x) + cos(x) = 2} does not have a solution.
This is due to the zero-product property. In principle, any polynomial equation of degree 2 can be factored as: (x - a)(x - b) = 0 Here is a specific example: (x - 5)(x + 3) = 0 Now, if the product of two factors is zero, it follows that one of the two factors is equal to zero; so the above becomes: x - 5 = 0 OR x + 3 = 0 Solving the individual parts, you get the two solutions. Of course, it is possible that the two factors happen to be the same; in this case, the polynomial is said to have a "double" root (i.e., a double solution). Similarly, a polynomial equation of degree 3 can be separated into 3 factors, a polynomial of degree 4 can be factored into 4 factors, etc.
Yes, that is often possible. It depends on the equation, of course - some equations have no solutions.
None because without an equality sign the given expression is not an equation and so therefore no solutions are possible.
An inconsistent equation (or system of equations) is one that has no possible solutions. That is precisely why we call it inconsistent; there is no solution set that can be substituted for its variable or variables that will make the equation (or system) true.
Without an equality sign the given terms can't be considered to be an equation and so therefore no solutions are possible.
When the equation is a polynomial whose highest order (power) is 2. Eg. y= x2 + 2x + 10. Then you can use quadratic formula to solve if factoring is not possible.
A polynomial discriminant is defined in terms of the difference in the roots of the polynomial equation. Since a binomial has only one root, there is nothing to take its difference from and so in such a situation, the discriminant is a meaningless concept.