answersLogoWhite

0

For the statement "convergence implies boundedness," the converse statement would be "boundedness implies convergence."

So, we are asking if "boundedness implies convergence" is a true statement.

Pf//

By way of contradiction, "boundedness implies convergence" is false.

Let the sequence (Xn) be defined as
Xn = 1 if n is even and
Xn = 0 if n is odd.
So, (Xn) = {X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6...} = {0,1,0,1,0,1,...}

Note that this is a divergent sequence.
Also note that for all n, -1 < Xn < 2

Therefore, the sequence (Xn) is bounded above by 2 and below by -1.

As we can see, we have a bounded function that is divergent. Therefore, by way of contradiction, we have proven the converse false.

Q.E.D.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Every convergent sequence is bounded is the converse is true?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp