answersLogoWhite

0

Wrong answer above. A limit is not the same thing as a limit point. A limit of a sequence is a limit point but not vice versa. Every bounded sequence does have at least one limit point. This is one of the versions of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem for sequences. The sequence {(-1)^n} actually has two limit points, -1 and 1, but no limit.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
More answers

A sequence, {xn}, is said to converge to a limit x if, given any e > 0, however small, there exists an integer k, such that abs(xk - x) < e for all n >=k. That is all value of the sequence, from xk onwrads, are no further from x than e.abs(xk - x) < e => -e < xk - x and x - xk < e which implies that xk is bounded.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

It cannot be proven because it is not true.

The sequence t(n) = (-1)n is bounded: by -1 and 1 but it does not have a limit point: it oscillates.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

The best answer is no answer

User Avatar

Nai'Lah Miller

Lvl 2
3y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Show that convergent sequence is bounded?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp