There is no one digit number that is wholly divisible by 4 and 9. * * * * * Unless you consider 0.
No, a 4-digit number is not always less than a 5-digit number. The value of a number is determined by the digits it contains, not the number of digits. For example, the 4-digit number 9999 is greater than the 5-digit number 1000. It is important to consider the actual numerical value when comparing numbers, not just the number of digits.
No. Consider 13 or 23.
108 -999, if you consider negative numbers.
If you consider whole numbers, the largest 5 digit number with repetition is 99999 the smallest 4 digit number without repetition is -9876 Their difference is 99999 - (-9876) = 99999 + 9876 = 109875.
There is no one digit number that is wholly divisible by 4 and 9. * * * * * Unless you consider 0.
No, a 4-digit number is not always less than a 5-digit number. The value of a number is determined by the digits it contains, not the number of digits. For example, the 4-digit number 9999 is greater than the 5-digit number 1000. It is important to consider the actual numerical value when comparing numbers, not just the number of digits.
No. Consider 13 or 23.
To find the product of a 2-digit number and a 4-digit number that is approximately 500,000, we need to consider the magnitude of the numbers involved. Since a 2-digit number ranges from 10 to 99 and a 4-digit number ranges from 1000 to 9999, their product will be in the range of 10,000 to 99,000,000. To get a product around 500,000, we can estimate that the 2-digit number is around 50 and the 4-digit number is around 10,000. Therefore, the product of a 50 and 10,000 is 500,000.
108 -999, if you consider negative numbers.
99 is. But if you want to get fancy, you might consider 99 .
If you consider whole numbers, the largest 5 digit number with repetition is 99999 the smallest 4 digit number without repetition is -9876 Their difference is 99999 - (-9876) = 99999 + 9876 = 109875.
Not necessarily. Consider 444. The digits are not different. The first and second digits are not multiples of 3 The first digit is not greater than the second digit. In spite of all that, 444 is a 3-digit number
The square of 8, which is 64 and the square of 9 is 81. Once you consider the square of 10, it is 100 so it is no longer a two digit number.
There cannot be a proper three digit number between 10 and 20. It must be a two digit number. If you consider a 2-digit number between 10 and 20, then its tens digit MUST be 1 and so MUST be odd. So most of this question is either wrong or irrelevant. Are you sure you have not cut and pasted bits from two questions?
The short answer is 1000. This is very easy to visualise: Simply consider each number in the combination to be a digit in a decimal number. We then end up with a three-digit number. Such a three-digit number ranges in value from 000 to 999, or 1000 unique combinations.
Yes. But that is true only if the 100 digits do not include 0. Or, if 0 is included, then you consider "0n0" to be a three digit number. Most people would consider is to be a 2-digit number.