They are not equivalent sets.
Equivalent sets are sets with exactly the same number of elements.
A group of joints that are parallel or nearly parallel.
yes, equal sets are equalent
the set is<9,3,4,5,4,> or<8,7,9,0,>
Two sets are said to be equivalent if the elements of each set can be put into a one-to-one relationship with the elements of the other set.
They are not equivalent sets.
Equivalent sets are sets with exactly the same number of elements.
No, they are not equivalent sets.
No, because equivalent sets are sets that have the SAME cardinality but equal sets are sets that all their elements are precisely the SAME. example: A={a,b,c} and B={1,2,3} equivalent sets C={1,2,3} and D={1,2,3} equal sets
Yes. Equivalent means equal.
I assume the question is meant to be about equivalent sets. Two sets are said to be equivalent if they have the same cardinality. For finite sets, it means that they must both have the same number of distinct elements. More generally, two sets are equivalent if (and only if) there exists a one-to-one mapping (bijection) from one set to the other. This definition applies to equivalence of infinite sets but does give rise to some counter-intuitive results. For example, the set of all integers is equivalent to its proper subset, the set of all odd integers. The mapping for all to evens is x-> 2x.
Equivalent sets are sets with exactly the same number of elements.
Yes.
A group of joints that are parallel or nearly parallel.
yes, equal sets are equalent
joined sets in math