answersLogoWhite

0

Flipping the graph of the function ( y = x^2 + 2x - 2 ) vertically involves multiplying the entire function by -1. This results in the new equation ( y = -(x^2 + 2x - 2) ), which can be simplified to ( y = -x^2 - 2x + 2 ). So, yes, the flipped graph can be represented as ( y = -(x^2 + 2x - 2) ).

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4h ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Y 2x plus 3 graph?

You can do the equation Y 2x plus 3 on a graph. On this graph the Y would equal 5 and X would equal to 0.


Which direction would the graph of y equals -x plus 2 plus 3?

down


Which point would be on the graph of the equeation y equals 2x plus 3?

2,4


Which direction would the graph of yx plus 2 plus 3 open?

It is not possible to answer the question because there is no equation - only an expression.


How do you graph y plus 2 equals 7?

The equation you have given, y + 2 = 7, does not describe a line, it describes the number 5. You would not graph a single number, there is nothing to graph.


Which direction would the graph of y equals x-4 plus 3 open?

Upwards.


What is the vertex of the graph y 3 x-1 2 plus 2?

The vertex of the graph Y 3 X-12 plus 2 would be -1/3 and -4/3. This is taught in math.


What is y equals x2 plus 2x plus 1 on a graph?

Interpreting that function as y=x2+2x+1, the graph of this function would be a parabola that opens upward. It would be equivalent to y=(x+1)2. Its vertex would be at (-1,0) and this vertex would be the parabola's only zero.


What describes how to translate the graph y x to obtain the graph of y x plus 1 plus 1?

You move the graph upwards by 2 units.


Which direction would the graph of y-x plus 2 plus 3 open?

The question contains an expression, not an equation. An expression does not have a graph. Furthermore, even if it were an equation, its form suggests that it would be a linear equation and a linear equation does not open in any direction.


If y 2x plus 1 were changed to y x plus 1 how would the graph of the new function compare with the first one?

It would be less steep.


Can the function Qd equals -30p plus 0.5y plus 2Pr plus 4T be graph?

Since the function depends on 4 variables (assuming that p and P are the same variable), the full graph would require 5 dimensions. You can, however, graph something like a cross-section for the graph, in the sense that you keep most of the variables constant, and study the dependency of the function on a single variable at a time.