An imaginary number is a square root of a negative number. Imaginary numbers have the form bi where b is a non-zero (real number) and i is the imaginary unit, defined as the square root of − 1.
if we define 'imaginary numbers' as 'complex numbers having a real part as 'zero' and a non-zero imaginary part'.. 0 doesn't fit in this description. But by, convention and for theoretical symmetry , we'll have to define 'real numbers' in pretty much the same way, and hence 0 would neither be a purely imaginary number or a purely real number.
Overall i would say that 0 is a real number. Imaginary numbers only involve square roots of negative numbers.
http://wiki.answers.com/Is_the_zero_imaginary_number#ixzz16w9viQWx
Chat with our AI personalities
No. Dividing by zero is undefined. It does not result in anything.
This is an interesting question. Looking at complex numbers graphically, zero is at the intersection of the real and imaginary axis, so it is 0 + 0i. But if you square zero, you get zero, which is not a negative number (a pure imaginary, when squared will give a real negative number), so I'd have to say it is not imaginary.
No. For example the number 1+i. Pure imaginary complex numbers are of the form 0 + a*i, where a is a non-zero real number.
You can describe it as a number defined such that i squared = -1.You can also define the complex plane first, and then describe an imaginary number as a complex number in which the real part is zero.
Real numbers are the subset of complex numbers with the property that their imaginary part is zero. Since the above number has no imaginary part, it is a real number.