A cubic.
-7p2 -2p3 + 5 is an expression, not an equation or inequality. An expression cannot be solved
Take the second derivative, set that equal to zero, and solve for x. All the possible x's you get from that are the x coordinates for the inflection points. To get the y coordinates, plug the x's back into the original equation and solve for y. I say x's because sometimes there will be multiple outputs. But since you're dealing with an equation to the third power, the second derivative's power will only be to the first, giving you only one x (one inflection point).
The problem cannot be solved because there is no equation (or inequality) in the question: only three disjoint terms.
since 2 to the third power(2x2x2)=8Then two to the third power times two to the third power(8x8) = 642x2x2 = 8
To get rid of a cubed number in an equation, you need to take its cube root. For example, if you have x raised to the third power is equal to 2 raised to the third power, then one takes the cube root of both sides of the equation to find that x is equal to 2.
When you raise a number to the third power, you get the 'cube' of the original number.
1000
cubed
A cubic.
When you raise a number to the third power, you get the 'cube' of the original number
cube
It is loosely called "cubing" the number.
a cubed number or a number to the third power
The Sight. The third series is called The Power of Three.
one of the measurements to the third power
The "degree" is the highest power - in this case, the 3 in 4x3 (4 times to the third power).