1350 is divisible by all of the numbers of 3, 6 and 9
Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
No, 9 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not six 3 x 9 = 27, also not divisible by 6
72,344 is not evenly divisible by 3 or by 6 or by 9.
42 is divisible by 2, 3 and 6 but not by 9.
All numbers divisible by 9 are divisible by 3; since 9 = 3 x 3 all multiples of 9 are also multiples of 3. However, all numbers divisible by 3 are not divisible by 9, eg 6 = 2 x 3 but 6 is not divisible by 9 (since 6 is not a multiple of 9) - it only takes one counter example to disprove a theory.
The smallest number divisible by 3 6 and 9 is 18.
All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.
yes. 2 + 1 + 6 = 9 9 is divisible by 3 so 216 is divisible by 3.
0, 3, 6 or 9.
Because 9 is divisible by 3, this is like the rule where if a number is divisible by 2 and 3 it is also divisible by 6.
No, because when something is divisible by 6, it is divisible by 2 or 3. This is divisible by 3, but not 2.
1, 2, 7, 3 and 6 are not divisible by 4 and/or 9. 12736 is divisible by 4 but not by 9.