Q: Is 1350 divisible 3 6 or 9?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Other Math

The smallest number divisible by 3 6 and 9 is 18.

yes. 2 + 1 + 6 = 9 9 is divisible by 3 so 216 is divisible by 3.

To check for divisibility by 9 sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 9 then so is the original number. For 32643: 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 18 which is divisible by 9 so 32643 is divisible by 9. As 9 = 3 × 3, any number divisible by 9 is also divisible by 3, thus as 32643 is divisible by 9 it is also divisible by 3. However, for completeness: to check for divisibility by 3 sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 3 then so is the original number. For 32643: 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 18 which is divisible by 3 so 32643 is divisible by 3.

Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 which is divisible by 3, so 234 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 234 is even so 234 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 234 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 234 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 234 is divisible by 9Thus 234 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.

no

Related questions

Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.

No, 9 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not six 3 x 9 = 27, also not divisible by 6

72,344 is not evenly divisible by 3 or by 6 or by 9.

42 is divisible by 2, 3 and 6 but not by 9.

All numbers divisible by 9 are divisible by 3; since 9 = 3 x 3 all multiples of 9 are also multiples of 3. However, all numbers divisible by 3 are not divisible by 9, eg 6 = 2 x 3 but 6 is not divisible by 9 (since 6 is not a multiple of 9) - it only takes one counter example to disprove a theory.

Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 3, so 684 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 684 is even so 684 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 684 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 684 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 9, so 684 is divisible by 9Thus 684 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.

The smallest number divisible by 3 6 and 9 is 18.

All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.

1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18, 25, 27, 30, 45, 50, 54, 75, 90, 135, 150, 225, 270, 450, 675, 1350.

yes. 2 + 1 + 6 = 9 9 is divisible by 3 so 216 is divisible by 3.

No, because when something is divisible by 6, it is divisible by 2 or 3. This is divisible by 3, but not 2.

0, 3, 6 or 9.