The smallest number divisible by 3 6 and 9 is 18.
yes. 2 + 1 + 6 = 9 9 is divisible by 3 so 216 is divisible by 3.
To check for divisibility by 9 sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 9 then so is the original number. For 32643: 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 18 which is divisible by 9 so 32643 is divisible by 9. As 9 = 3 × 3, any number divisible by 9 is also divisible by 3, thus as 32643 is divisible by 9 it is also divisible by 3. However, for completeness: to check for divisibility by 3 sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 3 then so is the original number. For 32643: 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 18 which is divisible by 3 so 32643 is divisible by 3.
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 which is divisible by 3, so 234 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 234 is even so 234 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 234 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 234 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 234 is divisible by 9Thus 234 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
Oh, let's take a moment to appreciate the beauty of numbers. To see if 23598 is divisible by 6, we can add up the digits (2+3+5+9+8) and check if the sum is divisible by 3. For 9, we can do the same and see if the sum is divisible by 9. Remember, there are no mistakes in math, just happy little numbers waiting to be discovered.
Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
To determine which number is divisible by 3, 6, and 9, we need to check if the sum of the digits of each number is divisible by 3. For 369: 3+6+9 = 18, which is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. Therefore, 369 is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. For 246: 2+4+6 = 12, which is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. Therefore, 246 is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. For 468: 4+6+8 = 18, which is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. Therefore, 468 is divisible by 3, 6, and 9. For 429: 4+2+9 = 15, which is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. Therefore, 429 is divisible by 3 but not by 6 or 9. Therefore, the numbers 369 and 468 are divisible by 3, 6, and 9.
No, 9 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not six 3 x 9 = 27, also not divisible by 6
72,344 is not evenly divisible by 3 or by 6 or by 9.
42 is divisible by 2, 3 and 6 but not by 9.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18, 25, 27, 30, 45, 50, 54, 75, 90, 135, 150, 225, 270, 450, 675, 1350.
All numbers divisible by 9 are divisible by 3; since 9 = 3 x 3 all multiples of 9 are also multiples of 3. However, all numbers divisible by 3 are not divisible by 9, eg 6 = 2 x 3 but 6 is not divisible by 9 (since 6 is not a multiple of 9) - it only takes one counter example to disprove a theory.
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 3, so 684 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 684 is even so 684 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 684 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 684 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 9, so 684 is divisible by 9Thus 684 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
The smallest number divisible by 3 6 and 9 is 18.
All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.
yes. 2 + 1 + 6 = 9 9 is divisible by 3 so 216 is divisible by 3.
No, because when something is divisible by 6, it is divisible by 2 or 3. This is divisible by 3, but not 2.