Conditional statement: If n2 equals 64, then n equals 8, where n2 equals 64 is the hypothesis, and n equals 8 is the conclusion. In order to obtain the converse of the conditional we reverse the 2 clauses, then the original conclusion becomes the new hypothesis and the original hypothesis becomes the new conclusion. So that, Converse: If n equals 8, then n2 equals 64.
No, 4 is a factor of 64.
16n
64
Yes because its discriminant is greater than zero.
(n - 4)(n - 12)
you cant factor this any more
6n2 + 16n can be factorised to give 2n(3n + 8) so the highest factor is 2n.
(8n)4(16n)2= (84n4)(162n2)=(82 x 162)(n4 x n2)= 1,048,576n4+2= 1,048,576n6
2n(3n + 8)
The GCF is 4n
-mn(m - n2)(m + n2)
.04m2-n2=(.2m+n)(.2m-n)
16n
Conditional statement: If n2 equals 64, then n equals 8, where n2 equals 64 is the hypothesis, and n equals 8 is the conclusion. In order to obtain the converse of the conditional we reverse the 2 clauses, then the original conclusion becomes the new hypothesis and the original hypothesis becomes the new conclusion. So that, Converse: If n equals 8, then n2 equals 64.
n2 + 9n + 18 = (n + 6)(n + 3)
It can be. 64 is a factor of 128, among others.