answersLogoWhite

0

1728 = 2 x 864 = 2x2 x 432 = 2x2x2 x 216 = 2x2x2 x 2 x 108 = 2x2x2 x 2x2 x 54 = 2x2x2 x 2x2x2 x 27 = 2x2x2 x 2x2x2 x 3 x 9 = 2x2x2 x 2x2x2 x 3x3x3 = 2x2x3 x 2x2x3 x 2x2x3 = 12 x 12 x 12

cube root = 12

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the cube root of 64 using prime factorization?

2^6 = 64 The cube root is 2^2, or 4


What is the prime factorization for 125?

The prime factorization for 125 is:5 X 5 x 5125 is the cube of 55x5x5


cube root of 15625 prime factorization?

25


What is the cube of 1728?

The cube root of 1728 is: 121728 cubed is: 5,159,780,352


What is the odd cube number of 1728?

1728 is even so it cannot have an odd cube root.


How do you find the cube root of 2330 using prime factorization?

If a factor appears 3 times, you get this factor (only once) times the cube root of a smaller number (the original number divided by the factor cubed).


What is a number cubed is 1728 what is the number?

the cube root of 1728 is 12


How is cube root 1728 equals 12?

Because 123 = 1728


Cube root of 1728?

12


What number multiplied by itself 3 times is 1728?

To find the number that, when multiplied by itself three times, equals 1728, you need to calculate the cube root of 1728. The cube root of 1728 is 12, since 12 × 12 × 12 = 1728. Therefore, the number is 12.


What number times itself three times equals 1728?

To find the number that, when multiplied by itself three times, equals 1728, we need to calculate the cube root of 1728. The cube root of 1728 is 12, since (12 \times 12 \times 12 = 1728). Thus, the number you are looking for is 12.


Is 200 perfect square or perfect cube?

200 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube. A perfect square is an integer that can be expressed as the square of another integer, and the prime factorization of 200 (2^3 × 5^2) does not allow for all exponents to be even. Similarly, for a perfect cube, the prime factorization requires all exponents to be multiples of three, which is also not the case for 200.