Drawing a conclusion based on too small a population sample is not reliable because the sample may not accurately represent the entire population, leading to biased or inaccurate results. It is important to use a sufficiently large and diverse sample size to ensure the validity and generalizability of conclusions.
Chat with our AI personalities
The paragraph employs the fallacy of hasty generalization, making a sweeping conclusion based on insufficient evidence or a small sample size.
The small sample fallacy occurs when research findings are based on a small number of participants, making it difficult to generalize the results to a larger population. This can impact the validity of the research findings because the sample may not be representative enough to draw accurate conclusions about the broader population.
False analogy: Comparing two things that are not truly alike to make a point. Hasty generalization: Drawing a conclusion based on insufficient evidence or a small sample size. Cherry-picking: Selectively choosing data that supports your argument while ignoring contradictory evidence. Ad hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
This is a fallacy known as hasty generalization, where a conclusion is drawn based on insufficient evidence or a small sample size. It assumes that because one person enjoys something, everyone in the same category must also enjoy it, which is not necessarily true.
A formal essay typically follows a structured format that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. It is characterized by a serious tone, use of third-person point of view, formal language, and adherence to grammar and punctuation rules. The essay should present a clear thesis statement, provide evidence to support arguments, and offer a well-reasoned conclusion that summarizes key points.